Mexico and Cuba relations issues. Havana imposes its agenda in a conspiracy that lost many years humanistic orientation
El Vedado, Havana, September 3, 2009, (SDP) The Ambassador of Mexico, Ricardo Pascoe, sat down with Jorge Arbesú, head of the Department dark American Communist Party Central Committee, at its headquarters on April 2, 2001, to chart a common strategy between the two states for the upcoming session of the Human Rights Commission, which would condemn Cuba by the constant violation of human rights.
Knowing that the "Department" is responsible for lawlessness subversion and terrorism in the hemisphere over the last fifty years, it is noteworthy that the Mexican ambassador to meet in that place to prepare the defense of the longest dictatorship in the continent. Maybe so, but Ambassador on the island, was considered the Mexican representative of the interests of F. Castro in Cuba.
The story is not extraordinary. In recent days, the national leader of the National Action Party (PAN), Cesar Nava, also met with Arbezú. He communicated his joy at the course of relations between the two states. It was attended by Peter Lobaina, Chief of the Mexico of the International Relations Department of the Central Committee and Manuel Aguilera, Ambassador in Mexico City.
rule, Mexican politicians (except Jorge Castañeda and Fox) and even the current President Calderon, are more interested in good relations with the dictatorship - that supports its destabilizing, as López Obrador and the PRD hardliners - that Cuban democrats. Fox and Castañeda
defended at the time one of engagement with human rights on the island and the pro-democracy forces. F. Castro replied with "guaguaso" (A bus that was planned against the embassy Aztec) and the "buzz" (made public the private telephone conversations between President Castro and V. F. Fox). Thus arose the "Tequila Effect", which paralyzes the Latin American presidents before Castro's beard.
soon be a year of signing the pact on immigration between the two governments. In essence, legitimize repressive and discriminatory nature of the rights of Cubans in Mexico and Cuba in third countries.
Different sources claim that the signature of the agreement was framed by the need of employers to CEMEX (Cementos Mexicanos) to obtain maximum dividends before the intervention would be victim from the Venezuelan government. As is known, anyone who has problems with Chavez knows that the best solution is to travel to Havana to talk to the Consigliere of the Americas Department of the Communist Central Committee. Offer something ... and something resolved.
CEMEX is the third largest cement producer in the world and was nationalized in Venezuela, with just a period of sixty days to discuss the basis of compensation Bolivarian lapsed. The net loss surgery were about 74% reduction in net earnings and the loss of 6 000 jobs. You can understand how suddenly the powerful Secretariat of State Mexicana was serving the poor and insoluble Chancery Castro. So the agreements signed a year ago are tailored to the sick vision of foreign policy of military rule.
They is not the slightest mention of any Cuban option to ask the Mexican government protection against persecution of the Cuban State requires much less monitor deportees for further protection against retaliation in Cuba. The Mexican State accepts good Cuban government's position not to get back to nationals to stay abroad "without permission" state.
The topic of the obligation of nations to accept entry of the natives to their respective countries is a matter of discussion in public international law. That was a dead letter in the agreements, which also placed the U.S. policy of humanitarian refugee reception in the sights of the foreign policy of the two states.
bases Immigration Pact of 2008 are in the migratory agreements signed in September 2001. They won the most control over trafficking and accepted the limits imposed by the military government. Trips were restricted Cuban tourist interest, job opportunities or escape, either to Mexico, as part of the path to reunification family in the United States of America.
Facing the Mexican national holiday on 15 September, leaves much to be desired foreign policy, with calls for freedom of Father Hidalgo.
aleagapesant@yahoo.es
El Vedado, Havana, September 3, 2009, (SDP) The Ambassador of Mexico, Ricardo Pascoe, sat down with Jorge Arbesú, head of the Department dark American Communist Party Central Committee, at its headquarters on April 2, 2001, to chart a common strategy between the two states for the upcoming session of the Human Rights Commission, which would condemn Cuba by the constant violation of human rights.
Knowing that the "Department" is responsible for lawlessness subversion and terrorism in the hemisphere over the last fifty years, it is noteworthy that the Mexican ambassador to meet in that place to prepare the defense of the longest dictatorship in the continent. Maybe so, but Ambassador on the island, was considered the Mexican representative of the interests of F. Castro in Cuba.
The story is not extraordinary. In recent days, the national leader of the National Action Party (PAN), Cesar Nava, also met with Arbezú. He communicated his joy at the course of relations between the two states. It was attended by Peter Lobaina, Chief of the Mexico of the International Relations Department of the Central Committee and Manuel Aguilera, Ambassador in Mexico City.
rule, Mexican politicians (except Jorge Castañeda and Fox) and even the current President Calderon, are more interested in good relations with the dictatorship - that supports its destabilizing, as López Obrador and the PRD hardliners - that Cuban democrats. Fox and Castañeda
defended at the time one of engagement with human rights on the island and the pro-democracy forces. F. Castro replied with "guaguaso" (A bus that was planned against the embassy Aztec) and the "buzz" (made public the private telephone conversations between President Castro and V. F. Fox). Thus arose the "Tequila Effect", which paralyzes the Latin American presidents before Castro's beard.
soon be a year of signing the pact on immigration between the two governments. In essence, legitimize repressive and discriminatory nature of the rights of Cubans in Mexico and Cuba in third countries.
Different sources claim that the signature of the agreement was framed by the need of employers to CEMEX (Cementos Mexicanos) to obtain maximum dividends before the intervention would be victim from the Venezuelan government. As is known, anyone who has problems with Chavez knows that the best solution is to travel to Havana to talk to the Consigliere of the Americas Department of the Communist Central Committee. Offer something ... and something resolved.
CEMEX is the third largest cement producer in the world and was nationalized in Venezuela, with just a period of sixty days to discuss the basis of compensation Bolivarian lapsed. The net loss surgery were about 74% reduction in net earnings and the loss of 6 000 jobs. You can understand how suddenly the powerful Secretariat of State Mexicana was serving the poor and insoluble Chancery Castro. So the agreements signed a year ago are tailored to the sick vision of foreign policy of military rule.
They is not the slightest mention of any Cuban option to ask the Mexican government protection against persecution of the Cuban State requires much less monitor deportees for further protection against retaliation in Cuba. The Mexican State accepts good Cuban government's position not to get back to nationals to stay abroad "without permission" state.
The topic of the obligation of nations to accept entry of the natives to their respective countries is a matter of discussion in public international law. That was a dead letter in the agreements, which also placed the U.S. policy of humanitarian refugee reception in the sights of the foreign policy of the two states.
bases Immigration Pact of 2008 are in the migratory agreements signed in September 2001. They won the most control over trafficking and accepted the limits imposed by the military government. Trips were restricted Cuban tourist interest, job opportunities or escape, either to Mexico, as part of the path to reunification family in the United States of America.
Facing the Mexican national holiday on 15 September, leaves much to be desired foreign policy, with calls for freedom of Father Hidalgo.
aleagapesant@yahoo.es
0 comments:
Post a Comment